WHY MOST CYBER RISK SCORES GET PRIORITIES WRONG — AND HOW TO FIX IT

Free Whitepaper

Many organizations — from local governments to small and medium businesses — use frameworks like NIST CSF and CIS Controls to measure cybersecurity. These frameworks are excellent for identifying gaps, but risks are too often prioritized using only severity labels like High, Medium, Low and compliant, not compliant.

This whitepaper looks at a smarter way to concentrate effort on what matters most — ensuring limited resources are spent fixing the right problems first.

What You'll Find

Why traditional framework compliance scoring misses true risk — and how a clearer method sharpens focus.

Why It Matters

With evolving threats and tighter budgets, focusing the right things first is essential.

Who Should Read It

IT leaders and decision-makers who need more impact from limited security resources and competing priorities.

Why Download This Whitepaper?

Get a clear, practical method to prioritize risk so efforts deliver the biggest impact. Don’t just identify risks—learn how to address them intelligently.

Cover Page Screenshot

FREE WHITEPAPER

Download Now
Free whitepaper
Why Most Cyber Risk Scores Get Priorities Wrong — and How to Fix It
~10-minute read • practical model overview